Internet Bandwidth and its Impact on Quality of Service and Quality of Experience

El Ancho de Banda de Internet y su Impacto en la Calidad de Servicio y Calidad de Experiencia

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/cesta.05.02.2024.ed

Dixon Salcedo E:\Users\aromero17\Downloads\orcid_16x16.png

Universidad de la Costa. Barranquilla, (Colombia)

dsalcedo2@cuc.edu.co

How to cite:

D. Salcedo “Internet bandwith and its impact on quality of service and quality of experience”, J. Comput. Electron. Sci.: Theory Appl., vol. 5 no. 2, pp. 1-4, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17981/cesta.05.02.2024.ed

According to Statista, Internet usage has increased to connect approximately 66% of the world’s population [1]. Consequently, this growth of global users and an increasingly Smart society (Internet dependent), added to the increase in digital inclusion, continues to be a significant problem to be solved [2], [3]. For example, in Colombia, by 2023, the mobile Internet penetration rate will reach 86.09 per 100 [4].

The Internet has become an essential tool that has permeated all human activities [5], [6]. Therefore, it is necessary to keep your access active 24/7/365 of the year [7]. Consequently, there is a primary activity that allows the services offered through the Internet to be maintained actively. This activity is the <<monitoring>> of the operation of telecommunications links and equipment [8]. Monitoring telecommunication links and equipment allows you to know the status of the communication network, showing its speed, type of traffic, applications used, and undue access, among others. [9], [10]. This is measured in Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE) when using Internet services [11], [12].

To know the status of a communication network, several metrics are analyzed, such as link capacity, available bandwidth, lost packets, and interferences, among other metrics [13], [14]. However, the Available Bandwidth (Av_bw) is the metric that provides information on the status of a telecommunications link in real-time so that network and telecommunications service managers can make decisions for the optimization of the platforms that offer Internet services, thus improving QoS and QoE indicators[15].

For monitoring the status of telecommunication services, proprietary tools (paid) and others based on free software (free) can be used to monitor the behavior of telecommunication links and network services.

Among the proprietary ones is ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer, the most widely used monitoring tool for network traffic analysis, which monitors users’ bandwidth utilization by collecting data on metrics such as packet size and latency. [12]. Paessler PRTG [16] is based on a network monitoring system for better management and analysis of your infrastructure. PRTG monitors network traffic using Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) packets because it allows you to ensure complete monitoring of any network link. WhatsUp Gold (Applying ICMP Protocol (Ping); It will enable knowing the connection status of a network device and logging the device’s connection on a website, which facilitates monitoring and generating alerts about possible problems with telecommunications connections or links [17].

On the other hand, tools based on open source, such as iperf, are multi-platform tools that actively measure the maximum bandwidth on a network link using IP. This tool can support TCP, UDP, and Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) packets in IPv4 and IPv6 versions. iPerf3 has been developed mainly by ESnet/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and was released under a three-clause BSD license [18], [19]. Pathload is a tool designed for active end-to-end measurement of network links. Pathload allows the estimate of the Av_bw of a network path. The tool uses the unidirectional delays of a periodic flow of packets that show an increasing trend when the flow speed is greater than the available bandwidth [20]. Traceband [21] is a tool based on a technique called hidden Markov model for estimating and monitoring the Ab_disp. This tool evaluates the state of a network link from end to end. It offers performance metrics such as measurement time and overhead, allowing it to be used in different telecommunication scenarios. TraceTCP is a tool that estimates the Ab_disp using the active traffic of the TCP transmission control protocol in a computer network. The method uses the Probe Gap Model (PGM) estimation approach. It takes advantage of the advantages the approach must take in managing and obtaining the delays of the packet pairs when interacting with Cross-Traffic (CT). This method determines the Ab_disp without inserting packets into the network and working only on the Receiver side without intervening with the transmitter, obtaining an easy-to-use method [22].

Maintaining Internet access poses many challenges related to computer security (Availability, Accessibility, and Integrity) [23]. First, user requirements must be known regarding minimum throughput levels to provide optimal QoS and maintain QoE at high satisfaction levels. Second, by understanding those user requirements, administrators and analysts of telecommunication systems and services should use Av_bw monitoring and estimation tools with better accuracy to determine the status of telecommunication links. Finally, with the information on the status of network links, network administrators can detect improvement opportunities that optimize the performance of network services and network infrastructure management, both logically and physically.

Additionally, maintaining optimal services that comply with QoS standards (for example, [24], [25] state that to maintain a quality video call, it is necessary to have an Av_bw between 1.0 and 4.0 Mbps approximately) is the task of administrators, who must monitor, process and analyze the behavior of different network flows to make decisions about the current configuration (robustness and security) of telecommunications equipment and servers that provide access to different Cloud-based services (known as hardening). Consequently, on the other hand, users experience the changes made by administrators through QoE, which allows measuring the level of user acceptance of the service provided (for example, the optimal levels of a video streaming platform must offer connections of at least 1.0 Mbps in different network architectures, in addition to the improvement of buffering techniques [26], [27]).

Finally, novel network architecture based on virtualization of network services facilitates their management and optimization, such as Service Design Network (SDN) [28], Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) [29], and the future of Internet-based services Named Data Networking (NDN) [30]; which open a wide spectrum of challenges in the monitoring of telecommunication links, not only at the level of their physical and logical state but also in security aspects [23].

REFERENCES

[1] “El uso de Internet a nivel mundial– Datos estadísticos | Statista.” Accessed: Dec. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://es.statista.com/temas/9795/el-uso-de-internet-en-el-mundo/#topicOverview

[2] “(PDF) “ Inclusión o Exclusión digital “ ? en las Instituciones Educativas oficiales del Distrito de Barranquilla | Dixon Salcedo - Academia.edu.” Accessed: Dec. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/30203129/_Inclusi%C3%B3n_o_Exclusi%C3%B3n_digital_en_las_Instituciones_Educativas_oficiales_del_Distrito_de_Barranquilla?uc-sb-sw=37378348

[3] H. Choudhary, N. Bansal, H. Choundhary, and N. Bansal, “Addressing Digital Divide through Digital Literacy Training Programs: A Systematic Literature Review,” Digital Education Review, ISSN-e 2013-9144, No. 41, 2022, págs. 224-248, no. 41, pp. 224–248, 2022, Accessed: Dec. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8526073&info=resumen&idioma=ENG

[4] “En 2023, Colombia alcanzó cerca de 54 millones de conexiones a Internet.” Accessed: Dec. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.crcom.gov.co/es/noticias/comunicado-prensa/en-2023-colombia-alcanzo-cerca-54-millones-conexiones-internet

[5] J. Zhang and Z. Chen, “Exploring Human Resource Management Digital Transformation in the Digital Age,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1482–1498, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S13132-023-01214-Y/METRICS.

[6] D. Salcedo, D. Suarez, J. Solano, and C. Henriquez, “Sistema Inteligente para para la gestión automática de un generador eléctrico basado en la arquitectura del IoT,” CESTA, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.17981/CESTA.01.01.2020.01.

[7] A. R. B. Ulloa, “Comparación de modelos de propagación de ondas de radio de un canal inalámbrico en el área urbana de la ciudad de Barranquilla,” CESTA, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–38, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.17981/CESTA.02.01.2021.03.

[8] D. Salcedo, C. D. Guerrero, and R. Martinez, “Available bandwidth estimation tools: Metrics, approach and performance,” International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, vol. 10, no. 3, 2018.

[9] D. Salcedo et al., “AVAILABLE BANDWIDTH ESTIMATION METRICS AS TOOLS TO EVALUATE NETWORK TRUNK LINKS,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 22, 2020.

[10] D. Salcedo, J. Guerrero, and C. D. Guerrero, “Overhead in available bandwidth estimation tools: Evaluation and analysis,” International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, vol. 9, no. 3, 2017.

[11] H. J. Kim, D. H. Lee, J. M. Lee, K. H. Lee, W. Lyu, and S. G. Choi, “The QoE evaluation method through the QoS-QoE correlation model,” Proceedings - 4th International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management, NCM 2008, vol. 2, pp. 719–725, 2008, doi: 10.1109/NCM.2008.202.

[12] A. C. Situmorang, M. Suryanegara, D. Gunawan, and F. H. Juwono, “Proposal of the Indonesian Framework for Telecommunications Infrastructure Based on Network and Socioeconomic Indicators,” Informatics, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 44, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/INFORMATICS10020044/S1.

[13] C. D. Guerrero and D. S. Morillo, “On the reduction of the available bandwidth estimation error through clustering with K-means,” in 2012 IEEE Latin-America Conference on Communications, LATINCOM 2012 - Conference Proceedings, 2012. doi: 10.1109/LATINCOM.2012.6506020.

[14] C. D. Guerrero, D. Salcedo, and H. Lamos, “A clustering approach to reduce the available bandwidth estimation error,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 11, no. 3, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TLA.2013.6568835.

[15] D. S. Morillo, C. G. Santander, and A. C. Cabezas, “NetFPGA: Status, uses, developments, challenges, and evaluation,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, 2020.

[16] A. Y. Daud, J. X. Tan, and W. J. Ooi, “Paessler Router Traffic Grapher (PRTG) Network Monitoring: An Implementation Process in Vitrox,” Journal of Digital System Development, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–11, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.32890/JDSD2024.2.2.1.

[17] K. Lappanitchayakul, “Development of Email and SMS Based Notification System to Detect Abnormal Network Conditions: A Case Study of Faculty of Business Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon, Thailand,” 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences, ICIIBMS 2018, pp. 98–105, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICIIBMS.2018.8549920.

[18] C. Park, A. Balasubramanian, W. Melville, H. School, and # Advisor, “A Look Into the Performance of mmWave 5G, 3G, 4G/LTE using PC Application, iPerf3, and DASH,” Journal of Student Research, vol. 12, no. 1, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.47611/jsrhs.v12i1.4109.

[19] “iPerf - The TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool.” Accessed: Dec. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://iperf.fr/

[20] J. M., “Pathload : A measurement tool for end-to-end available bandwidth,” Proc. of Passive and Active Measurements (PAM) Workshop, Mar. 2002, 2002, Accessed: Dec. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1572543025340635904

[21] C. D. Guerrero and M. A. Labrador, “Traceband: A fast, low overhead and accurate tool for available bandwidth estimation and monitoring,” Computer Networks, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 977–990, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.COMNET.2009.09.024.

[22] “NC2021/0005693 - Patente de Invención Nacional - MÉTODO DE ESTIMACIÓN DE ANCHO DE BANDA DISPONIBLE NO INTRUSIVO USANDO EL TRAFICO ACTIVO DEL PROTOCOLO DE CONTROL DE TRANSMISIÓN TCP EN UNA RED DE COMPUTADORES.” Accessed: Dec. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sipi.sic.gov.co/sipi/Extra/IP/Mutual/Browse.aspx?sid=638704005868970833

[23] J. Mardini-Bovea, D. Salcedo, I. Nagles-Pozo, Y. Quiñonez, and J. Mejía, “Training and Classification Techniques in Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Network Anomalies Comparative Study,” pp. 313–331, 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-50590-4_20.

[24] M. Schmitt, J. Redi, P. Cesar, and D. Bulterman, “1Mbps is enough: Video quality and individual idiosyncrasies in multiparty HD video-conferencing,” 2016 8th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEX 2016, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1109/QOMEX.2016.7498961.

[25] P. Raussi, H. Kokkoniemi-Tarkkanen, K. Ahola, A. Heikkinen, and M. Uitto, “CASE STUDY Prioritizing protection communication in a 5G slice: Evaluating HTB traffic shaping and UL bitrate adaptation for enhanced reliability,” 2023, doi: 10.1049/tje2.12309.

[26] YuEncheng et al., “Mustang: Improving QoE for Real-Time Video in Cellular Networks by Masking Jitter,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3672399.

[27] A. Ahmed, Z. Shafiq, H. Bedi, and A. Khakpour, “Suffering from buffering? Detecting QoE impairments in live video streams,” Proceedings - International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP, vol. 2017-October, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICNP.2017.8117561.

[28] “SDN | The Service Design Network.” Accessed: Dec. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.service-design-network.org/

[29] “Building Open Source NFV - OPNFV.” Accessed: Dec. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.opnfv.org/end-users/building-open-source-nfv

[30] “Named Data Networking (NDN) - A Future Internet Architecture.” Accessed: Dec. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://named-data.net/

Author 1 Ph.D. in Engineering with an emphasis in Telecommunications from the Pontifical Bolivarian University, Medellin, Colombia. Additionally, he holds an M.Sc. in Free Software, emphasizing Computer Networks and Systems Administration, from the Autonomous University of Bucaramanga - Colombia, and a bachelor’s degree from the Autonomous University of the Caribbean (Universidad Autónoma del Caribe). Currently, he is a professor in the Systems Engineering program attached to the Department of Computer Science and Electronics. He is a Software and Network Engineering Research Group member of the Universidad de la Costa-CUC, Barranquilla, Colombia. His research interests are in the quality of service in Internet networks, software development, Internet of Things, Data Science applications, and AI applications https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-8462