El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.10

Palabras clave:

equilibrio de intereses, estado procesal, poderes, organismo de investigación, seguridad jurídica

Resumen

El tema central del estudio se encuentra constituido por el rol social y la independencia procesal que cumple el investigador en los procedimientos penales de la Federación de Rusia como un sujeto clave, que dirige los procedimientos penales en las etapas previas al juicio. Los autores examinan la relación entre el investigador, el fiscal, el jefe del organismo de investigación, el interrogador y otros participantes en el procedimiento penal frente a la independencia procesal para el investigador. La metodología de investigación utilizada se basa en la metodología jurídica dialéctica, formal lógica y comparativa. Como resultado del estudio, se pudo determinar el rol social del investigador en el procedimiento penal, el cual se considera como elemento fundamental de la independencia procesal. Se concluye que los roles sociales del tribunal y del investigador en el proceso penal son comparables en cuanto a la defensa de los intereses públicos y a la importancia de su participación en la aplicación de las normas del derecho penal. Al mismo tiempo, al tribunal se le reconoce una función exclusiva: la administración de justicia. Se destaca que el vacio normativo referente a la independencia procesal del investigador no permite determinar su rol social como garante del equilibrio de intereses y de la responsabilidad mutua entre el individuo y el Estado, ya que el investigador sólo puede ser considerado responsable como representante del Estado si es independiente al momento de proceder según su discreción.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Gyulnaz Eldarovna Adygezalova, Kuban State University. Krasnodar (Russian Federation)

Doctor of Law, Kuban State University (Krasnodar, RF). ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3682-2121

Andrey Mikhailovich Dolgov, Kuban State University. Krasnodar (Russian Federation)

Ph.D. in Law, Kuban State University (Krasnodar, RF). ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-0450

Husen Manaevich Lukozhev, Kuban State University. Krasnodar (Russian Federation)

Ph.D. in Law, Kuban State University (Krasnodar, RF). ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-6356

Tatyana Valerievna Faroi, Kuban State University. Krasnodar (Russian Federation)

Ph.D. in Law, Kuban State University (Krasnodar, RF). ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-5593

Mikhail Aleksandrovich Redkovskiy, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the City of Krasnodar. Krasnodar (Russian Federation)

Colonel of Justice, Head of the Investigation Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the city of Krasnodar (Krasnodar, RF). ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7189-4924

Citas

Adygezalova, G. E. (2017). Sociological jurisprudence of the United States in the 20th century: the formation of doctrine, the development and improvement of the rule of law. [Doctoral thesis]. Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia.

Adygezalova, G. E. (2012). Sociological jurisprudence of the United States in the twentieth century: the formation of doctrine, the development and improvement of the rule of law. St. Petersburg: Legal-Press Centre.

Adygezalova, G. E. (2008). Harmonization of the interests of the state, society and the individual (from the standpoint of American sociological jurisprudence and the realistic school of law). In, RGNF, State responsibility to the individual: the experience of history and the present: materials of the international conference, (pp. 132–142). Krasnodar: Kuban State University.

Adygezalova, G. E., Faroi, T. V., Mikhel, D. E. & Lukozhev, H. M. (2020). Judicial debate in criminal proceedings as a way of expressing the interests of the parties to the conflict. Revista Inclusiones, 7(SI), 319–327. Available: https://revistainclusiones.org/index.php/inclu/article/view/322

Austin, J. (1995). The province of jurisprudence determined. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.

Begiev, Kh. B. (2010a). Problems of ensuring the procedural independence of the investigator at the stage of the completion of the preliminary investigation. Society and law, 5(32), 194–200. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/site119/folder_page/003/467/465/sl-2010-5.pdf

Begiev, Kh. B. (2010b). Implementation of the procedural independence of the investigator at the stage of initiating a criminal case in modern criminal proceedings in Russia. Society and law, 2(29), 206–212. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/site119/folder_page/003/467/465/sl-2010-2.pdf

Denis, D. (1974). L’enquete preliminaire. Etude theorique et pratique. Paris: Police-revue.

Federal Republic of Germany. (2019). Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/28/Germany/show

French Republic. (2020). Criminal Code of Procedure of the French Republic. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/30/France/show

Gladysheva, O. V., Lukozhev, Kh. M. & Sementsov, V. A. (2013). Guarantees of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings: problems and possible solutions. Moscow: Yurlitinform.

Gredyagin, I. V. (2010). The concept and content of the procedural independence of the interrogator. Society and Law, 4(31), 252–255. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-i-soderzhanie-protsessualnoy-samostoyatelnosti-doznavatelya

Gutnik, O. V. (2017). Institute for the independence of the court in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation. Russian Law, (4), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2017.125.4.067-073

Iering, R. (1881). Purpose in law. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of N.V. Muravyov.

Ivanov, A. L. (2010). Procurator’s protection of citizens’ constitutional rights. Legality, 9(911), 55–57.

Kachalova, O. V. (2014). Procedural independence of the investigator through the prism of his social function. Crime Investigation: problems and ways of their solutions, 4, 349–354.

Khazhnagoev, A. Z. (2005). Procedural independence of the investigator and prosecutor’s supervision. Russian Agricultural Journal, 6, 12–14.

Khoryakov, S. N. (2006). Procedural independence of the investigator. [Doctor thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Lapaeva, V. V. (2000). Sociology of law. Moscow: Norma-Infra-M.

Lloyd, D. & Freeman, M. (1979). Introduction to jurisprudence. London: Stevens & Sons.

Lukozhev, Kh. M. & Dolgov, A. M. (2018). Inquiry as a form of preliminary investigation. Moscow: Yurlitinform.

Melnikov, V. Yu. (2008). Investigator and interrogator in criminal proceedings. Conflict processing, 4, 3–6.

Melnikov, V. Yu. (2008). Procedural independence of the investigator as a guarantee of the protection of the rights and freedoms of the individual. Business Safety, 2, 6–12. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/protsessualnaya-samostoyatelnost-sledovatelya-kak-garantiya-zaschity-konstitutsionnyh-prav-i-svobod-uchastnikov-ugolovnogo

Motyleva, E. A. (2004). On the procedural independence of the investigator of the internal affairs bodies. Law and Justice, 4, 54–55.

Nersesyants, V. S. (1999). Philosophy of law: Textbook for universities. Moscow: Norma-Infra-M.

Ogorodov, A. N. (2017). Procedural independence of an investigator in criminal proceedings. [Doctoral thesis]. University of Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Olisov, R. Yu. (2006). The ratio of the procedural independence of the investigator and prosecutor’s supervision in domestic pre-trial proceedings. [Doctoral Thesis]. N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod National Research, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia.

Popova, T. Yu. (2010). Influence of remedial and administrative powers of the head of investigatory body on realization of procedural independence of the investigato. Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1(12), 161–165. Available from https://media.mvd.ru/files/application/1000854

Pound, R. (1945a). An introduction to the philosophy of law. New Haven/London: Yale University Press/Humphrey Milford-Oxford University Press.

Pound, R. (1945b). Criminal justice in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Pound, R. (1942). Social control through law. New Haven/London: Yale University Press/Humphrey Milford-Oxford University Press.

Prusak, F. (1984). Prosecutor's supervision over preparatory proceedings. Warszawa: Legal Editorial.

RF. State Duma. (2020). Constitution of the Russian Federation. [Online]. Available: http://www.constitution.ru/

RF. State Duma. (November 22, 2001). The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [УПК РФ]. Federal Law No. 174-FZ. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901802257

Republic or Poland. (2003). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Poland. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/10/Poland/show

Romashov, R. A. & Nizhnik, N. S. (Eds.) (2005). State, society, personality: compatibility problems. Moscow: Yuurist.

Schroeder, F. C. (2014). Strafprozessrecht. München: C. H. Beck.

Sementsov, V. A. (2017). Investigative actions in pre-trial proceedings (general provisions of theory and practice). Moscow: Yurlitinform.

Sidorenko, M. V. (2018). Legal certainty of Russian criminal procedure law. [Doctoral thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Sidorenko, M. V. (2017). Legal certainty of the Russian criminal procedural law (state and formulation of the problem). Moscow: Yurlitinform.

Soyer, J.-Cl. (1992). Droit penal et procedure penale. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.

Zhidkov, O. A. (Ed.) (1999). Anthology of world legal thought: In 5 volumes. [Vol. 3. Europe. America: 17th–20th centuries]. Moscow: Mysl.

Publicado

2022-02-15

Cómo citar

Adygezalova, G. E., Dolgov, A. M., Lukozhev, H. M., Faroi, T. V., & Redkovskiy, M. A. (2022). El rol y la independencia del investigador en el procedimiento penal de la Federación de Rusia. JURÍDICAS CUC, 18(1), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.10