From the rational appraisal of evidence in procedural truth to the theory of preponderant probability
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8197-7010
Abstract
This article deals with evidence as linked to the perennial search to find the absolute truth on the part of the State’s jurisdiction in its epistemological effort for rational evaluation of the evidence of facts. However, from the inductive method, the present work had the purpose of determining ―in spite of the infinite difficulties of reaching such a pretension― the doctrinal developments that converge in the mission to reach a relative truth, or a procedural truth that abandons the effort for the true truth. Regardless of the cognitive difficulties, this qualitative study demonstrates that this is possible through the theory of the preponderant probability, which leads to the conclusion that the truth of the facts can be reconstructed through the means of evidence and, with it, reach a relative truth reinforced in degrees under the preponderant probability schemes.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The authors are exclusively responsible for the published articles, which do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial committee.
JURIDICAS CUC respects the moral rights of authors who have assigned the property rights on the published materials to the editorial committee. In turn, the authors declare that the work they submit has not been previously published.